Tuck,
The discussion evolved. From how Tom and others may elect to do things to a discussion on the appropriateness or, for even more debate, professionalism of dressing in a specific way for specific circumstances.
No one, at least not that I can read, has said Tom or Patrick or any one is evil or reprehensible for their choice of attire.
Some, however, have chosen to point out that there are consequences to any decision.
Like it or not, our appearance communicates to those that see us and for most, it is the only communication they receive.
If you need any evidence as to the degradation and near destruction of appropriateness of attire, simply spend 30 seconds in any major metropolitan American city, and witness the asinine and disrespectful display of young men with their ridiculously loose pants, so ignorantly ill fitted that they have to hold them up by hand, with their under ware in full view. What is you impression of those choices?
No standards leads to no standing.
The discussion evolved. From how Tom and others may elect to do things to a discussion on the appropriateness or, for even more debate, professionalism of dressing in a specific way for specific circumstances.
No one, at least not that I can read, has said Tom or Patrick or any one is evil or reprehensible for their choice of attire.
Some, however, have chosen to point out that there are consequences to any decision.
Like it or not, our appearance communicates to those that see us and for most, it is the only communication they receive.
If you need any evidence as to the degradation and near destruction of appropriateness of attire, simply spend 30 seconds in any major metropolitan American city, and witness the asinine and disrespectful display of young men with their ridiculously loose pants, so ignorantly ill fitted that they have to hold them up by hand, with their under ware in full view. What is you impression of those choices?
No standards leads to no standing.



