Didn't even vote.
Gigs have mostly been few and far between since Covid.
Hoping it's better in 2026,
but I'm not counting eggs.
Gigs have mostly been few and far between since Covid.
Hoping it's better in 2026,
but I'm not counting eggs.
Didn't even vote.
Gigs have mostly been few and far between since Covid.
Hoping it's better in 2026,
but I'm not counting eggs.
Please I don't mean any disrespect. What does what the companies expenses have to do with what the DJ gets paid? I understand they have expenses running their business. Also what about the DJ as Tunes4046 said it making enough money to make a profit to justify them doing the event?The amount of marketing a big company needs to do is mind boggling. One company I know spends $200k alone in advertising and of course needs insurance that covers 10+ events at a time. Add workman’s comp, payroll tax, warehouse, office staff… and that’s just off the top of my head
I don’t think you understand how business works, the goal is to make a healthy profit to sustain the company and provide future growth, in most businesses one of the biggest expenses is labor. The more you pay employees the less is left for company. Most people aren’t in business to just get by, they want to grow the business live a very comfortable lifestyle plan for their futures in vest for retirement. You have to control labor costsPlease I don't mean any disrespect. What does what the companies expenses have to do with what the DJ gets paid? I understand they have expenses running their business. Also what about the DJ as Tunes4046 said it making enough money to make a profit to justify them doing the event?
What I have seen with such multi ops is that on average they pay the DJ $500 or less. That may not be in every case. They just pay a DJ a small amount where they collect a substantial amount. Enough that they could afford to pay a bit more.
Those expenses the companies pay are what keep the gigs coming for the DJs. Insurance is a real thing and many venues require it. The DJs I sub for are using their Insurance policy to secure the gig. The advertising that gets the client has a real cost to it. I wouldn't take the gig if it wasn't worth my time and effort. The DJs I subcontract gigs from a good friends of mine and they know what my requirements are for taking a gig. None of them take more than 15% of the total fee.Please I don't mean any disrespect. What does what the companies expenses have to do with what the DJ gets paid? I understand they have expenses running their business. Also what about the DJ as Tunes4046 said it making enough money to make a profit to justify them doing the event?
I hear you and I understand. My concern is about ME. If I'm not the owner of the company then what their expenses are is not my concern. Look at it this way. People who go on strike at a job are looking out for what's best for them. Those nurses that are on strike in NY are on strike because they want their situation to get better.I don’t think you understand how business works, the goal is to make a healthy profit to sustain the company and provide future growth, in most businesses one of the biggest expenses is labor. The more you pay employees the less is left for company. Most people aren’t in business to just get by, they want to grow the business live a very comfortable lifestyle plan for their futures in vest for retirement. You have to control labor costs
If a business has to close because labor costs are too high then you have no incomeI hear you and I understand. My concern is about ME. If I'm not the owner of the company then what their expenses are is not my concern. Look at it this way. People who go on strike at a job are looking out for what's best for them. Those nurses that are on strike in NY are on strike because they want their situation to get better.
We can start by acknowledging that if the office is in the DJs home (or none at all) then that alone is a HUGE monthly cost difference from those that are opening their commercial office doors 5 or more days a week.I would assume their business plan is predicated by the cost of entertainment, once you get big costs of doing business increase exponentially, what they pay the dj is only a very small part of the cost associated with securing the event running the business paying proper taxes, marketing, insurance and much much more
Those expenses the companies pay are what keep the gigs coming for the DJs. Insurance is a real thing and many venues require it. The DJs I sub for are using their Insurance policy to secure the gig. The advertising that gets the client has a real cost to it. I wouldn't take the gig if it wasn't worth my time and effort. The DJs I subcontract gigs from a good friends of mine and they know what my requirements are for taking a gig. None of them take more than 15% of the total fee.
This is the problem people don’t think big picture. If you had a choice between pay that’s reasonable or no pay because you want too much to make employing you possible which would you chooseI hear you and I understand. My concern is about ME. If I'm not the owner of the company then what their expenses are is not my concern. Look at it this way. People who go on strike at a job are looking out for what's best for them. Those nurses that are on strike in NY are on strike because they want their situation to get better.
I think he meant there’s only 15% profit after all expenses are factoredThey are super generous if they are only taking 15% and pay you 85% NET on the fee, especially in 2025/2026. I am very certain just about ALL the companies now in the DC region pay 50% to 60% to the DJ. My sister still works a lot of sub contract gigs, and they won't book her and pay her more than $600 these days unless it's a previous repeat client that was originally set up under the old pay structure of 75% NET to the DJ. She did a job the other day for $500, and the client paid $1,000. She hates it, but she always needs money and has basically accepted the low pay on these jobs in order to keep an income come in. Also, what is worse with them is they collect the payments from the client, and then make her wait 3-4 weeks after the event is completed to actually get paid now. They moved to a direct deposit system, and at first it was set dates every two weeks, but they decided to change that and just let the entertainers wait until whenever they feel like doing payroll which is running 3-4 weeks now. I think they just "Rob Peter to Pay Paul" type of scheme going on. I have told her not to work with them any more with all this BS going on, but she continues to deal with it. It is unfortunate that a working DJ that has been with them for almost 30 years has to deal with people operating a business in this manner.
What would you call reasonable vs wanting too much?This is the problem people don’t think big picture. If you had a choice between pay that’s reasonable or no pay because you want too much to make employing you possible which would you choose
She chooses to deal with them. Unless they are the only game in town any multi-op would be thrilled to have a 30 year DJ knock on their doorMy sister still works a lot of sub contract gigs, and they won't book her and pay her more than $600 these days unless it's a previous repeat client that was originally set up under the old pay structure of 75% NET to the DJ. She did a job the other day for $500, and the client paid $1,000. She hates it, but she always needs money and has basically accepted the low pay on these jobs in order to keep an income come in. Also, what is worse with them is they collect the payments from the client, and then make her wait 3-4 weeks after the event is completed to actually get paid now. They moved to a direct deposit system, and at first it was set dates every two weeks, but they decided to change that and just let the entertainers wait until whenever they feel like doing payroll which is running 3-4 weeks now. I think they just "Rob Peter to Pay Paul" type of scheme going on. I have told her not to work with them any more with all this BS going on, but she continues to deal with it. It is unfortunate that a working DJ that has been with them for almost 30 years has to deal with people operating a business in this manner.
If your mindset is on what you are getting paid and you are as good of a DJ as you have professed to in many many post on this forum, why do you accept so many extremely low paying gigsWhat would you call reasonable vs wanting too much?
I worked for Newark Public Schools for 33 years before I retired. When I retired in 2013 they were getting $950 million dollars a year to run that school system. My salary was $22 an hour. So I was getting paid more than minimum wage. I understood they had a lot of money going to different places. My concern wasn't how they were spending the money. My concern was what I was getting paid.
I understand that you own several businesses and your concern is how much you are making from those businesses which you should. You need to make a certain amount of money to stay in business and you need to make a certain amount in profit to justify you staying in business.
I'm just of the mind set its about what I am getting paid. If I worked for one of those companies doing an event, it would be none of my business how much they make from securing the event.
You have said multiple times that I said I'm a good DJ. I don't remember saying that. I've tried my best to remain humble. I don't claim to be a good DJ even though others have said that including my buddy that's a DJ. I try to remain humble because of how I lost the business many years ago. I just won't allow anyone to talk to me like I'm complete garbage.If your mindset is on what you are getting paid and you are as good of a DJ as you have professed to in many many post on this forum, why do you accept so many extremely low paying gigs
I'm getting 15% of what the client pays.I think he meant there’s only 15% profit after all expenses are factored
I hope those packages are $4000+I'm getting 15% of what the client pays.
I'm getting 15% of what the client pays.