A clarification needs to be made here. I do receptions exclusively and don't mix and have great dance floors. Tempo flow and what you play is more important IMO. Blending two songs seamlessly doesn't mean much if those songs suck![]()
That's rather ignorant.
You have great dance floors ONLY because of great songs - meaning your potential is LIMITED to your supply of great songs - other people's dance appealing work. You're doing only what anyone and everyone can do with a playlist.
A great mix makes not-so-great songs sound more appealing to a dancer which gives a mix DJ the ability to fill a dance floor with far more diversity and range than you ever could. I see it all the time - other DJs and emcees who write down the songs I play with great success only to discover the songs don't work when they play them. They simply don't get the fact that the mix provided the context that made the song work.. on it's own it may not have that kind of dance appeal.
This is a perfect example of why so many "wedding DJs' all sound the same - because they are limited to pulling out the same routine collection of dance hits... there's nothing about the playlist that would make people take note of the DJ or his ability.
We all get compliments - but, how many of you are complimented with phrases like "..it's so refreshing to hear someone that can actually mix" or "that was great music and not all the usual stuff..?" These are the details that separate a real DJ from an emcee, etc.
Last edited: