The New EV Evolve 70 and Evolve 90

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!
A hundred or so, seated at round tables dispersed across the room, plus a food station area. This facility was a large baquent/wedding space, but the event was a synposium by a non-profit organization within the Bio-tech industry. Unlike a wedding these events are a captive audience.

Presenter's Podium, panel discussion, audio for video, and mics for Q&A with the audience.

Easy peasy. The EV50 probably didn't even break a sweat. I'd like to try it out with a 500-person audience. I know the dispersion is excellent on these units but what I'm not sure of is length of throw. I did several huge rooms with a single Bose L1 (probably under-powered but it still covered the room very well). My opinion, these EV50s smash the performance of the Bose L1. I imagine the bottom end of the 70 and 90 are going to be terrific.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ittigger
My opinion, these EV50s smash the performance of the Bose L1. I imagine the bottom end of the 70 and 90 are going to be terrific.
Fyi, just like the Ev line up, There are a number of L1 models. Model 1, Model 2, L1s, compact, pro8, Pro16, pro32, plus different bass bin/ sub sizes and combinations.
Just as I'm sure there is a big difference in the Ev models, same with L1's

Regardless, I'm sure the new EVs won't disappoint.
 
Fyi, just like the Ev line up, There are a number of L1 models. Model 1, Model 2, L1s, compact, pro8, Pro16, pro32, plus different bass bin/ sub sizes and combinations.
Just as I'm sure there is a big difference in the Ev models, same with L1's

Regardless, I'm sure the new EVs won't disappoint.

Yeah, mine was a L1M2 with the double (small) subs. Bottom end dropped off after about 50 ft. I'm sure the newer units likely have better performance. I heard a pro32 rig a few weeks back. The bottom end sounded kinda mushy and the top end was a bit dull, to my taste. Anytime I used my L1M2 I always had to add a bit of highs to get some more air in the sound. It was very good, back then. The tone of the EV50m is very crisp and well-balanced, at least to my ears, and that's with eq set at flat.
 
Easy peasy. The EV50 probably didn't even break a sweat. I'd like to try it out with a 500-person audience.
They didn't work too hard and it was a live room with a lot of glass and smooth walls. But voice is very different from music, and NO, they aren't going to do 500 people for voice in a meeting room. '

In an auditorium or theater? Maybe I could get away with that for 500. The difference is a captive audience in an almost acoustically perfect space.

Dispersion and distribution are two very different things. Even with music - bigger speakers and more volume down front to address people out back is going to result in a steady stream of opposing volume requests.

Even when DJing I try not to approach my sound like I'm trying to get an extra 5 feet of throw from the garden hose. :)
 
They didn't work too hard and it was a live room with a lot of glass and smooth walls. But voice is very different from music, and NO, they aren't going to do 500 people for voice in a meeting room. '

In an auditorium or theater? Maybe I could get away with that for 500. The difference is a captive audience in an almost acoustically perfect space.

Dispersion and distribution are two very different things. Even with music - bigger speakers and more volume down front to address people out back is going to result in a steady stream of opposing volume requests.

Even when DJing I try not to approach my sound like I'm trying to get an extra 5 feet of throw from the garden hose. :)

Just a guess but I'd say a pair of EV50s will probably service 200-250. Question, if you're doing 500, could you do it with 2 pairs of 50s or go another route? So far, I can't say that I've run into any situation that the pair of 50Ms won't cover with ease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ittigger
It would depend on the space.
I can think on one room that is 160' wide x 60' deep (4 salon ballroom) and in that space I could put 4 units along the font wall because the audience is expanding right-to-left but no deeper than about 45'. I would still add a small something at the stage for a front fill. (Capacity is 800 seated at rounds or schoolboy, 1000 classroom.)

But when the room is getting deeper rather than wider (or both) then keeping the sound pleasantly comfortable calls for a distributed system, delay speakers, etc. It's not enough to hear a voice - it also has to be intelligible. Turning up the volume also increases reflections - the energy of which could mimic the source. People may "hear" the voice, and yet not be able understand what is being said. Loudness comes at the expense of clarity if we don't plan accordingly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Romard
Question, if you're doing 500, could you do it with 2 pairs of 50s or go another route?
For music that might work. It too, depends on the application and we have to remember that these cabinets sit on the floor and crowd density matters. We can't simply raise them up without also tilting them due to the vertical coverage pattern.

We can get away with a lot for a dance floor because atfer the first beverage loud trumps clarity every time. But what about the rest of the shared space? If I'm not drinking can I still have a conversation at my table in the back of the room? Are the reflections (as in your example of it actually being louder further back) so strong and destructive that converstion is nearly imposible?

This is the skew that confounds wedding DJs who's dance floor sits in the sweet spot, while continuous complaints come from people at tables somewhere off in the back or side of the room.

I once had a long time DJ residency in club where the dance floor was in the center of the space, surrounded by a large bar area on one side, and numerous booths on all others. You could have a conversation even at the front side of the bar (just 7' from the dance floor) because the louder sound was on the ceiling, and directional. The rest of the space was addressed by local speakers at a different level.

Another issue arises when you start lining up multiple pairs of these column speakers. When the dispersion is that wide - comb filtering could be inevitable and this will affect individual listening experiences on a seat-by-seat basis. You could literally be sitting at a table - and by moving one seat to the right or left notice a totally different sound quality. Comb filtering is exacerbated by strong reflections, and together with the time differential can really wreak havoc as the volume level increases.

A single pair of the EV50 worked well in my seminar example because the disctance from presenter to front row audience was short, and the dispersion wide. The distance to the rear wall or either end wall was significantly longer than the direct path to audience (decay before reflection.) Note, that I had these speakers placed about 50ft apart! The trick was to align them so the coverage was complete in the audience while dropping off significantly at the rostrum (making it easier to get high mic gain,)

There are situations where conventional PA speakers on sticks (60 deg, vs 110 deg,) provide better control because of the more narrow directionality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Romard