From a webmasters prospective, anything with public voting (no registration) is open to abuse, the IT people at Curves have to realize this. IP checks are probably the best measure against vote abuse, although who's to say someone doesn't pop open 30 proxies in the browser?
So, I have to ask why open voting to the public for a contest like this? Why not only registered members? You're just asking for problems.
The vote adjustment just plain looks bad. You're not going to tell me Curves went though the logs line by line and removed votes coming from cell tower based IPs. If you know anything about cell internet capabilities often numerous users, (some times all) from the same tower have the same internet facing IP address.. How was that dealt with?
If you're going to have public voting like this it always turns into who has the most friends, not who's story is most inspiring or best. In this case it would save a lot of headaches if outside of IP checks 'anything goes' was the rule.
So, I have to ask why open voting to the public for a contest like this? Why not only registered members? You're just asking for problems.
The vote adjustment just plain looks bad. You're not going to tell me Curves went though the logs line by line and removed votes coming from cell tower based IPs. If you know anything about cell internet capabilities often numerous users, (some times all) from the same tower have the same internet facing IP address.. How was that dealt with?
If you're going to have public voting like this it always turns into who has the most friends, not who's story is most inspiring or best. In this case it would save a lot of headaches if outside of IP checks 'anything goes' was the rule.


