So, back to our original thread. For those of you that forgot in the midst of all the other debate that could have been handled in PMs, here it is:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/about/
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
I was FOR the war, because I thought the Iraqis needed to get rid of a dictator, and naively believed that they would make far more of an effort towards advancing themselves in a civilized manner.
But other than that? He sounds like me!
Now, this guy sounds a lot like Paul Sarbanes to a point. Other than Sarbanes-Oxley, which was mostly Oxley and a PITA for the feds, Paul didn't really do anything either.
I want a good, honest-to-goodness, controversial candidate. One that's willing to step in and get their hands dirty. Sure, I'm not going to agree with everything they say, but I want somebody that's going to kick some azz.
2008's going to be the year of the Democrat. Like it, hate it, it doesn't matter because most of America are just tired of the Republicans.
So, what does that mean? More spending on government and social programs. I work for the government and my agency is a social program, so, we get more money to get lots of things fixed.
Hillary? Say what you want, she's in favor of health care. This could be a big shot in the arm for Medicare and believe me, Medicare needs it. But, more than that, maybe we can finally get down to building a Unified Health Record that not only gives the doctors the ability to correctly share health information but also gives the patients a lot of privacy protection. Can you imagine a patient record system that allows the doctor to know all of your allergies and prescriptions so that he/she will not prescribe a drug your are allergic to or will negatively interact with whatever you are taking now? We need a politician that is in favor of health care.
As to pro-life, sure, I am pro-life, but I am also pro-gun and pro-kill-the-bastard-that-shoots-up-a-mall-because-he-is-having-a-bad-hair-day.
So, now that we remeber what the original topic was, let's keep it there...