T39 Bill Fitzmaurice subs

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!

rickryan.com

Mac Daddy DJ
ODJT Supporter
Dec 9, 2009
20,055
18,451
62
Hendersonville, TN
www.rickryan.com
Not sure why my other thread got closed but.......soundinmotion, I received Bil Fitzmaurice's plans for the T39s. Wow, very detailed build out. I thought I might tackle these myself but it's going to cost $200-$300 just for the materials and I'm not convinced I'd EVER get them right. Might as well pay a pro who has experience building these cabs besides, he says he'll have them complete within 2 weeks. I'm thinking I'm going to go with the 20" wide version and use LAB12 drivers. I'm also seeing now that I need to break down and use a crossover instead of depending on the amp's built-in crossovers. No need in wasting power below 45hz. This thing also has me re-thinking how I've been doing sub placement in different venues. In the future I'll probably start looking for places to hide the subs, like you've been doing on your dance competitions. I'm already taking Canute's approach on spread tops out further and usually backing them up to the wall. They stick out less and blend in with the room better. I am curious, do you find these horns throw the lows further out and, if so, what's normally the best placement to make sure I've got maximum bass in the dance area? Thanks again for all your help on this.
 
Not sure why my other thread got closed but.......soundinmotion, I received Bil Fitzmaurice's plans for the T39s. Wow, very detailed build out. I thought I might tackle these myself but it's going to cost $200-$300 just for the materials and I'm not convinced I'd EVER get them right. Might as well pay a pro who has experience building these cabs besides, he says he'll have them complete within 2 weeks. I'm thinking I'm going to go with the 20" wide version and use LAB12 drivers. I'm also seeing now that I need to break down and use a crossover instead of depending on the amp's built-in crossovers. No need in wasting power below 45hz. This thing also has me re-thinking how I've been doing sub placement in different venues. In the future I'll probably start looking for places to hide the subs, like you've been doing on your dance competitions. I'm already taking Canute's approach on spread tops out further and usually backing them up to the wall. They stick out less and blend in with the room better. I am curious, do you find these horns throw the lows further out and, if so, what's normally the best placement to make sure I've got maximum bass in the dance area? Thanks again for all your help on this.
How many of these do you plan on building? What is your ultimate Master setup? Remember Sound said that he can add to his minimum setup and integrate it upwards to handle bigger crowds.
 
I can afford 2 now but will add more as needed.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 4 Beta
If you plan on ending up with lets say 4, what Ohms speakers are you planning to use in each starting with these current two you have in mind?
 
4 ohm. I may switch to 8 ohm later but drivers are cheap.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 4 Beta
If you are planning on going to four why not choose 8ohms to start then when you add the other pair just run it in parallel via a jumper from the back. Have your Builder put a Parallel output on the back for said jumper so that you do not have to run double cables, one to each box. If you are buying a new amp then also buy an amp suitable for running the pair per side. For example, if the Speaker is 300W @ 8 ohms when you add the second to each side you will have 600w at 4 ohms. Give yourself the necessary headroom so you don't run into early clipping. An Amplifier 400w-500w per side into 8 ohms will more than get you covered for that example.
 
Last edited:
I am curious, do you find these horns throw the lows further out and, if so, what's normally the best placement to make sure I've got maximum bass in the dance area? Thanks again for all your help on this.

"Throw" when it comes to speaker cabinets is a BIG MYTH.

Folded horn subs act as low pass filters. The cabinet will not produce much beyond 200Hz.
Direct radiator subs produce harmonics of the fundamental frequencies and produce content well beyond "sub frequencies"...content to 800Hz is not uncommon.

In rooms with low(er) ceilings (or close(r) walls), which is anything shorter than one wavelength (28ft @40Hz), the reflections from the ceiling/wall are strong enough to cause cancellations with the sounds coming directly from the cabinet. These cancellations lead to the myth about "throw" or "wave formation" with subs. All subs are susceptible, but because folded horns do not produce higher frequency harmonics, the effect is more pronounced.

The sound from the subs and tops must have room to integrate at the listening position. Generally, if the subs and tops are in the same plane (e.g. up against the same wall), the closest "good" listening position will be half distance that the tops are separated. The tops should be separated by at least 22.6ft (two wavelengths @100Hz). So, if the tops are split by 22.6ft, and the subs are centered between the tops on the wall...the "good" listening space will be about 11ft from the wall. The farther apart the tops are, the farther the stand off distance. If you have a wiiiiiiiide listening area, multiple tops at 22-ish ft intervals along the long wall are best.

Best placement for subs will (almost) always be corner or wall loaded. That additional boundary reinforcement is (almost) always better for sound in the room than any other choice. In NO event should subs be placed with the radiating plane between 2.5 and 8ft from a wall or corner boundary.

Finally, while I am happy to answer general questions here...for specific questions about Bill's cabinets, the best answers will come from Bill's forum. I highly recommend signing up over there to get the best information about those cabinets.

- - - Updated - - -

If you are planning on going to four why not choose 8ohms to start then when you add the other pair just run it in parallel via a jumper from the back. Have your Builder put a Parallel output on the back for said jumper so that you do not have to run double cables, one to each box. If you are buying a new amp then also buy an amp suitable for running the pair per side. For example, if the Speaker is 300W @ 8 ohms when you add the second to each side you will have 600w at 4 ohms. Give yourself the necessary headroom so you don't run into early clipping. A 400w-500w per side into 8 ohms will more than get you covered.

Generally this is really good advice.

However, in the specific instance of Bill's folded horns, this is not a required strategy. Horn loaded subs do not distort before they blow (the folded horn path acts as a low pass filter and removes the distortion sounds). Hard limiters are REQUIRED when running folded horn subs. As a result, the amp does not need to be over-spec'd by the typical 2x RMS rule of thumb. There are good reasons to have amps with higher ratings, for instance they tend to have better heat sinks and will run cooler. Headroom is necessary in the signal path, and should be accounted for when setting the gain structure of the whole signal path.

I prefer to have 8ohm cabinets. If I need to run a "full system" (tops and subs) with a single amp, I can still have two cabinets per channel without stressing the amp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
"Throw" when it comes to speaker cabinets is a BIG MYTH.

Folded horn subs act as low pass filters. The cabinet will not produce much beyond 200Hz.
Direct radiator subs produce harmonics of the fundamental frequencies and produce content well beyond "sub frequencies"...content to 800Hz is not uncommon.

In rooms with low(er) ceilings (or close(r) walls), which is anything shorter than one wavelength (28ft @40Hz), the reflections from the ceiling/wall are strong enough to cause cancellations with the sounds coming directly from the cabinet. These cancellations lead to the myth about "throw" or "wave formation" with subs. All subs are susceptible, but because folded horns do not produce higher frequency harmonics, the effect is more pronounced.

The sound from the subs and tops must have room to integrate at the listening position. Generally, if the subs and tops are in the same plane (e.g. up against the same wall), the closest "good" listening position will be half distance that the tops are separated. The tops should be separated by at least 22.6ft (two wavelengths @100Hz). So, if the tops are split by 22.6ft, and the subs are centered between the tops on the wall...the "good" listening space will be about 11ft from the wall. The farther apart the tops are, the farther the stand off distance. If you have a wiiiiiiiide listening area, multiple tops at 22-ish ft intervals along the long wall are best.

Best placement for subs will (almost) always be corner or wall loaded. That additional boundary reinforcement is (almost) always better for sound in the room than any other choice. In NO event should subs be placed with the radiating plane between 2.5 and 8ft from a wall or corner boundary.

Finally, while I am happy to answer general questions here...for specific questions about Bill's cabinets, the best answers will come from Bill's forum. I highly recommend signing up over there to get the best information about those cabinets.

- - - Updated - - -



Generally this is really good advice.

However, in the specific instance of Bill's folded horns, this is not a required strategy. Horn loaded subs do not distort before they blow (the folded horn path acts as a low pass filter and removes the distortion sounds). Hard limiters are REQUIRED when running folded horn subs. As a result, the amp does not need to be over-spec'd by the typical 2x RMS rule of thumb. There are good reasons to have amps with higher ratings, for instance they tend to have better heat sinks and will run cooler. Headroom is necessary in the signal path, and should be accounted for when setting the gain structure of the whole signal path.

I prefer to have 8ohm cabinets. If I need to run a "full system" (tops and subs) with a single amp, I can still have two cabinets per channel without stressing the amp.
Agreed. But don't tell that to a West Indian like me. LOL Ask DRZINC, we love our bass. At one time long ago, my amp for my JBLs were considered inadequate and they were, however I used to run a DBX Sub Harmonic Synthesizer on the outgoing Bass Signal to give me my additional Bass. Hahaha....some guys tried to follow and ended up blowing open their Woofers.
 
If you are planning on going to four why not choose 8ohms to start then when you add the other pair just run it in parallel via a jumper from the back. Have your Builder put a Parallel output on the back for said jumper so that you do not have to run double cables, one to each box. If you are buying a new amp then also buy an amp suitable for running the pair per side. For example, if the Speaker is 300W @ 8 ohms when you add the second to each side you will have 600w at 4 ohms. Give yourself the necessary headroom so you don't run into early clipping. An Amplifier 400w-500w per side into 8 ohms will more than get you covered for that example.

I'm not PLANNING on going to 4 cabinets. I MIGHT add more cabinets but for a standard wedding rig, I'd really like to be able to run 2 subs to cover the job. If I load them at 4 and Bill says the cab pushes it to an effective 6 ohm load, that's only pushing about 600 watts. Keep in mind, I don't want to HAVE to change out all my components at this point in time. I simply want to change out from radiators to horn. I'll start changing other pieces out as time/money permits and to swap out 4-ohm drivers for 8-ohm is only $150 per cab. If I can get a pair of cabs that will properly load my current amps, then I should get the most bang out of them until upgrade time. Using my current amps, a pair of 4s will give me total wattage of 1760 vs 880 for 8s.
 
I'm not PLANNING on going to 4 cabinets. I MIGHT add more cabinets but for a standard wedding rig, I'd really like to be able to run 2 subs to cover the job. If I load them at 4 and Bill says the cab pushes it to an effective 6 ohm load, that's only pushing about 600 watts. Keep in mind, I don't want to HAVE to change out all my components at this point in time. I simply want to change out from radiators to horn. I'll start changing other pieces out as time/money permits and to swap out 4-ohm drivers for 8-ohm is only $150 per cab. If I can get a pair of cabs that will properly load my current amps, then I should get the most bang out of them until upgrade time. Using my current amps, a pair of 4s will give me total wattage of 1760 vs 880 for 8s.
Don't forget when you change the resistance of the drivers you are also conversely changing the output of the amps. I will leave it there since I have no idea what specific driver you plan on using and also what amp you plan on using. Lots of Manufactures are advertising power in 4ohms now because to a lot of guys not in the know those numbers appear larger than when advertised in 8ohms. Like "Sound" stated, 8ohms are more versatile because it is much easier to add another to the side and end up with 4ohms instead of 2ohms to stress the amp.
 
Using my current amps, a pair of 4s will give me total wattage of 1760 vs 880 for 8s.

The *theoretical* difference in SPL for any doubling of wattage is +3dB. Except that really anything over 500w doesn't result in much usable SPL due to power compression.

More specifically, in a T39 the displacement maximum voltage is 50V for the Lab12 or 3012LF. At 50V, a 10ohm (8ohm + horn) load will see 250W. At 50V, a 6ohm (4ohm + horn) load will see under 420W. So...in either case, the amp wattage is TOTAL overkill for T39's.
 
I to am a student of the 8 ohm cabs (tops and subs). I did use horn loaded subs in the 1980's when CV made better stuff. I found them to have tremendous punch and were great when I needed to drive very loud volume levels. I found them to be much less musical than a bass reflex, vented, cab at most sound volumes I used for smaller gigs. I also found the horn loaded subs to have a very narrow sweet spot. With that said I loved my folded horn CV subs.

Now I use EV-TX1181 (18" subs), that are 8 ohms and I have eight of them. They are rated at 500 rms and 2000 peak, with 100 db effeciency. Like soundinmotiondj said, keeping all my cabs at an 8 ohm rating gives me a lot of flexability. I have three EV-Q1212 amps in my large rolling rack and one EV-CP4000s in my small carry in rack. I like to run my amps at 60-80% load, if I find I need more sound in the room I add more cabs (with subs I keep them coupled), this gives me the benifits of twice the cone surface area, additional coupling and shows the amps a 4 ohm load. So basically I am still pushing the amps to the same level, however I am doubling the current flow thru them.

I did an A/B test this weekend with my new CP4000s amp against one of my Q1212 amps. I went to the CP4000s as it is 20 lbs lighter than the Q1212 and my carry in rack had reached a portly 100 lbs. I set up four TX1181 subs and two TX1122 tops. I could not hear any difference in the amps and the only thing I noticed was when the Q1212 flashed the limit light the CP4000 did not and the CP4000 drew 1.3 amps less thru the Furman.

I tested all my equipment due to the fact that I moved and re-routed wirring in both racks, I did not want to show up at the first gig proud of my work only to find it wasn't right. The biggest finding is when I hooked up all three Q1212 amps with only a pair of speakers each (all 8 ohm loads) and drove the volume hard, to insure the fans came on, it took 4 songs before I drew enough power across the output rails to generate enough heat to get the fans to come on. I was driving the system above 90%, the 0 db light was flashing often and the limit light was flashing a little, the current draw from the wall at this volume level with 8 ohm load on three amps was 6.3 amps thru the Furman.

I guess what I am getting at is, if you may add more boxes then buy 8 ohm drivers, it will produce more than enough sound for you, be much easier on the amps and the wall socket. If you get in a room or crowd size that eats volume, them you can add additional boxes to create the SPL you need and still keep your amps at a healthy load, but remember the wall socket them becomes the choke point.

On an additional note, on my small set up I can easily add a third TX1181 to the CP4000, giving it a 2.3 to 3 ohm load on one channel and play a pretty large room and the amp will play in the load all day long, don't try that with the lesser amps. The CP4000 will play four subs on one channel but the bass gets boomy, I think the amp looses all of it dampening factor if I try more than three subs on a channel.

Thanks Ray J.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
If you want good horns, I sell you my Yorkville Unity subs .. about as musical as they come. They'll be on the block shortly once I pick up the replacements.
 
The *theoretical* difference in SPL for any doubling of wattage is +3dB. Except that really anything over 500w doesn't result in much usable SPL due to power compression.

More specifically, in a T39 the displacement maximum voltage is 50V for the Lab12 or 3012LF. At 50V, a 10ohm (8ohm + horn) load will see 250W. At 50V, a 6ohm (4ohm + horn) load will see under 420W. So...in either case, the amp wattage is TOTAL overkill for T39's.

I know you're right but for the life of me, i'm just having a hard wrapping my head around getting good sub volume out of 250 watts of power. The 880 that currently hits each of my 18s has yet to even hit a yellow light (much less clip) but still, I've had a few times where my head was just thinking I was pushing it. Trying to wrap my head around having the same volume level at a third of the wattage is just difficult to get. I dunno, you guys are close to talking me into 8-ohm drivers. You're right, I could build out another 2 cabs and be able to load them on the same amp configuration. Thanks for the discussion. This is useful stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I know you're right but for the life of me, i'm just having a hard wrapping my head around getting good sub volume out of 250 watts of power. The 880 that currently hits each of my 18s has yet to even hit a yellow light (much less clip) but still, I've had a few times where my head was just thinking I was pushing it. Trying to wrap my head around having the same volume level at a third of the wattage is just difficult to get. I dunno, you guys are close to talking me into 8-ohm drivers. You're right, I could build out another 2 cabs and be able to load them on the same amp configuration. Thanks for the discussion. This is useful stuff.
You are looking at just watt numbers instead of wattage in relation to ohmage. This is exactly why the Amp and Speaker Manufacturers started advertising 4 ohms wattage because they know the new crop of DJs who are not schooled in electronics would fall for that stuff. My JBL Scoops are 300watts each but into 16ohms. The thing is that they get power to amplify just that one speaker each. When I place a jumper between two (= Parallel), it makes that load 600watts @8ohms. If I add another like pair then I get 1,200 w @ 4 ohms
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
But a single cabinet is still getting roughly the same amount of wattage. Because the 1200 watts is now devided across 4 cabinets. 1200/4= 300 each. If you use 4 ohm speakers, you get 1200 watts with just two cabinets.
 
But a single cabinet is still getting roughly the same amount of wattage. Because the 1200 watts is now devided across 4 cabinets. 1200/4= 300 each. If you use 4 ohm speakers, you get 1200 watts with just two cabinets.
Wes, it is not all that simple. Several things have to be taken into consideration. Transducer's Sensitivity, Current Draw, Voltage Output/Input, Speaker Design, Amp Design etc. . This is why a properly designed system is important. BTW a 4 ohm load is more taxing on an amp than a 8ohm load. It will cause more current draw and if the circuit is overloaded at a venue then you can have tripped fuses/breakers more often.
 
I know you're right but for the life of me, i'm just having a hard wrapping my head around getting good sub volume out of 250 watts of power.

As ahouston has pointed out, there is not simple transfer function to get the applied voltage that will generate Xmax on the driver. That requires modeling the full driver in the full cabinet. In the case of Titan 39's that work has been done. The voltage for Xmax with a 10" driver is 35V, and for a 12" driver is 50V.

You need to STOP thinking about watts and start thinking about voltage. There is no other way forward. The ONLY reason watts are discussed is because the marketing department noticed that the numbers were bigger. Amps produce voltage. Depending on the total impedance of the load, Ohm's law defines the amount of current that will be supplied. But the key to understanding is the voltage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Well, I guess this little project is on go. One of the DJs I book is an engineer and has a woodworking shop and has volunteered to build out the cabs if I provide the wood. He was blown away by the specs when I showed him Fitzmaurice's website and is probably more curious than I am about whether these bad boys will actually deliver as promised.

- - - Updated - - -

By the way, I found the following excerpt from Fitzmaurice's document quite interesting:

Output isn’t about watts, it’s about driver displacement (T/S spec Vd). The BP102 has 207cc Vd, the Delta 12LF 243 cc, so the Delta 12 is only slightly louder. The 3010LF Vd 305cc, so it runs about 4dB louder than the BP102 or Delta 12 LF. The Lab 12 Vd is 659cc, so it’s equivalent to three BP102 or Delta 12LF, justifying its weight and price. When comparing various drivers don’t look at the watts, look at the displacement.

Obviously, I'm intending to do an 18"-20" wide cabinet with the Lab 12 driver. That's an include amount of displacement quoted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people