Well, if you are referring to my post, well, am a PT DJ. I do this almost as a hobby. So, on that note, yeah, I want what I want. And if the customer wants what I offer, then great, we can work together. If not, then we won't. If one is a FT DJ, I imagine that they do have to be willing to adjust what they do to stay afloat. That's the beauty of it for me. I don't do it for the money, and I only do what works for me, as I only accept the clients I think I will enjoy.
Your post isn't something I'm trying to single out, it's a sentiment in almost every thread on any board.
You're follow up point on the other hand is completely off the mark. The notion that as a full time event person I have to sacrifice something to make it work is completely contrary to the reality of being full time.
Let me speculate here but, I'm willing to bet that you depend very heavily on new LEADS, (individual customers) and a very limited number of recurring customers; with much of the recurring clientelle being made up of short budget clients like schools or charity?
As a career event person, the backbone of my income is from recurring ACCOUNTS. That is, I invoice the same agencies, corporations, and other event professionals multiple times a year over many years and even decades. I enjoy individual wedding customers and the like but, the backbone of my living is made by working for clients with larger budgets and multiple event needs.
The difference here, is that you likley
sort through individual leads to find your "comfort zone", where in my case my career leads already reside fully within my comfort zone. Doing it for the money means I've worked hard to develop something I like doing for that money.
My point was that there is NO FAULT on the part of other people, or "the industry" if they don't happen to fall within
our respective comfort zones. There's just something inherently silly about always blaming the customers when
their priority doesn't match
our intention. It was that point that came across so stronly in the OP.