I am just a little guy in a very big pond here but I am curious why nobody is taking about what speakers they are using with these amps....that makes a difference too.....
Just a thought....
If Peavey, EV, QSC, Crown or DynaCord would like to give me system to test in the sound reinforcement business for some of the local bands....I would gladly test them....Its Christmas after all!!!!!!
I'll put in a call to the North Pole.
The more I think about it the more fun I think it would be to HAVE an amplifier shoot out. Maybe ODJT sponsored (Dan?). EV/Dynacord have offered up an amp to test, I'm certain QSC and Crown would too... but something Thunder said earlier is echoing with me. He pointed out that the Peavey's cost less than the QSC, Crown, Dynacord, etc. The thread is titled Best of the Best, but maybe it should be Best for the Buck?
Some have pointed to amps that are even more expensive and no doubt superior. I guess that has me wondering... how can one really settle this? If price is what matters, why stop at Peavey? There are certainly cheaper amps, does that make them better yet? They make noise for less?
We can get in to grouded or floating bridge design, ringing, clamping, back EMF, A/B vs. H vs. D topology and all kinds of fun things but as soon as we start saying, well yes it's better but it costs more, then we're changing the rules.
I guess at the end of the day, it's up to what the user demands. I do not know of a single tour rider* nor a single consultant's spec for installed sound that calls for Peavey, where QSC, Crown and EV/Dynacord are on many. EV is going in the new Dallas Cowboy's stadium. I am not aware of a single major sports venue powered by Peavey amps. Am I knocking them? No. I agree with Steve, there is a place for them... but the people writing the specs and riders say that place is not on those tours or in those installations. Whether or not it's in your rack is up to you.
Ben
*The Jager tour does not count, Peavey sponsors it. No pay to play allowed.


