This is fundamentally flawed because you are trying to equate "price" with material value and they are not the same thing, If it were, than anything given as a gift, charity, or from self motivation would immediately be worthless to anyone involved.There are plenty of clients who only want to pay the bare minimum
If you prefer to buy a Mercedes rather than a Yugo, that is your choice, but not everybody has that choice.
More importantly, when we talk about labor it is unlike material goods because it is transcedant not simply material. Many people choose for intrinsic value first, and monetary gain second. That has never been more true for artists or anyone expressing a personal talent.
Your Mercedes/Yugo analogy leaves no room for the customer who wants neither brand, or who has a specific application for the Yugo for which the Mercedes is ill equipped. Example: 50+ year old DJs claiming there's no money in the youth events market. Answer: There's simply no money for DJs who can't connect with a youth market. Similarly, age will eventually intrude upon the wedding market DJ as well. We may still have our DJ skills, but no one wants grandpa dropping anything like it's hot, or breakin' something off.
Neither is it reasonable to rate cars on the brand when we know buyers arrive at the dealership with a specific list of expectations and requirements. One of those requirements may be: "I only make short trips" that buyer wants better liquidity than leaving a Mercedes parked in the garage for most of it's useful life. I have a birthday every year but it's not necessary or desirable that I party like Paris Hilton every 364 days out.
I point this out because I've lived through decades of postings by DJs on boards like this knowing all the while I'd outpaced many self proclaimed 'Mercedes' wedding DJs just on mere $175 Karaoke rentals alone (the 'Yugo'.) The depth of a given lake is indifferent to how that water arrived - be it by a suddenly opened dam or continuous rain.
Last edited:
