UPDATE:
The couple just called me today to provide some insight as to how the concerns were addressed. Figured I'd share the update on how they were handled.
- On the time given for breakdown: The venue responded to the couple with surprise saying that they've never had a dj, let alone a couple questioning it, w an issue with getting out in 30 min and thought that was fair. Couple said for what they're doing and for the type of presentation they're investing in, that I need closer to an hour. The venue asked what were they planning on doing... The couple then shared pictures of my setup as well as my website. The venue (according to the couple) while scrolling through my socials said "wow, we've never had a dj that nice here... I can see why he needs more time". So with that, they said the couple can have an hour but that's it before it costs them.
- On the sound system, once the venue understood the caliber of what we do and the types of weddings we perform, they simply said, plug into their system and if there is an issue w/ quality, they'll allow me to use mine.
Overall... the venue wants the couple to be happy and get the quality of wedding they want. They admitted the type of dj's they normally see have subpar sound, especially for such a large room (holds 300+), which is why they opted to install one so dj's don't complain that it's hard to make the sound be good in there. They were even surprised to see all the lighting I offered, the glam style photo booth which they've only seen couples get a handful of times ever, etc. Usually couples hire dj's who don't offer anything like that and if they want anything elevated in terms of quality, they have to outsource it. Most dj's just have like a gigbar style light, at best have a spandex type facade, and as such never get any pushback on their requirements.