so would this be the same theory?
http://video.msn.com/video.aspx/?mk...&from=imbot_en-ca_m_3549&fg=rss&wa=wsignin1.0
Not really. The link that you posted is for Home Theater. The previous links are for Pro Sound. Wake up Jon!
so would this be the same theory?
http://video.msn.com/video.aspx/?mk...&from=imbot_en-ca_m_3549&fg=rss&wa=wsignin1.0
Im awake its a theory and used in other Home audio/ Pro Audio systems that sell both.
The principle is the same. A line array is still a line array, be it home theatre, L1 or a 40kw ampitheater install.
My theory on Line array:
It just doesn't matter. I don't measure and I don't calculate. I listen. If it sounds good to me and to my clients, and it looks good to the clients and it's easy to me to be mobile with the stuff, it works for me. I leave my meter and calculators at home.
Wether its technically a line array or stack o' speakers really isn't going to affect what I do. The only question for me is do I need 1 or up to 6 to do the job.
I work on my making my job as simple as possible while giving my clients what they want.
At least that's my theory.
Isn't a line array that is not at least 4 times the wavelength of the frequency being measured, and the drivers have to be at least 1/2 wavelength apart, otherwise it's just a column of speakers?
SNIP...
Somebody that knows more than me can go into more detail please, or correct me if I'm completely wrong and I'll bow out of this discussion.
My theory on Line array:
It just doesn't matter. I don't measure and I don't calculate. I listen.
Very few people have "perfect pitch." Many people have trained to have good "relative pitch." Part of that training involves a lot of listening to reference tones or music or speech in an effort to learn to hear variations from that reference.
I beg to differ. Most people we deal with in this business wouldn't know good sound if they fell over it. Alot of times I find they are so used to screachy midrange that they can't hear quality sound properly and find it's not loud enough
You are completely wrong.
I don't think that I am completely wrong. There are many papers about the physics of line arrays that correspond to my posting.
cclark65 said:Isn't a line array that is not at least 4 times the wavelength of the frequency being measured, and the drivers have to be at least 1/2 wavelength apart, otherwise it's just a column of speakers?
There are two conditions for line source behavior. The first is that the line has to be at least four times as tall as the wavelength it is radiating for a vertical pattern that is a reasonable approximation of a plane wave. A second requirement is that the sources on the line have to be less than 1/2 wavelength apart. This is the inverse of the first requirement. Olsoni calculated in the 1940’s that two adjacent sources radiate a spherical polar pattern (i.e. sum coherently) when they are less than 1/4 wavelength apart. Between 1/4 and 1/2-wavelength spacing the pattern narrows, but side lobes (interference patterns, caused by destructive interference) do not appear until the spacing is greater than 1/2 wavelength.
What does this mean in practice? Only very long line arrays can function as a line source at low frequencies, while only very short modules can couple at high frequencies. In the real world, the actual range of line source behavior is typically less than one octave. The answer to the question of whether a line array is a line source is “almost never.”
As we have seen, practical "line array" systems as used in high-power applications are actually a combination of "classical" line arrays for the low frequencies and highly directive wave guides for the high frequencies. Because of this hybrid nature, it is difficult to apply predictions from classical line array theory across the whole audio spectrum. Nonetheless, line array systems can be made to work reasonably well in both the far field and moderately close to the array.