G
Guest
Guest
I've had both and I prefer active. My cabinets are small, light and sounds incredible. Unless you bi-amp your tops in a passive rig, meaning one amp for the woofer and one for the horn (not to mention, more cables!), active tops are going to sound better and be more efficient due to their built-in active crossover. You would also need a third amp for your sub woofer. A built-in 24dB per octave crossover in a bi-amped top will always provide better sound quality than simply pushing power into a passive top equipped with an old-fashioned passive crossover. Do you know how much of your amps power is being sucked up by the passive crossover? Not to mention, the active crossover built into any decent active top is perfectly matched, calibrated and time-aligned for that enclosure and those drivers / amps. Wattage and limiting is perfectly matched to the driver as well. I could go on...
As far as transportation goes... I can carry my normal active sound rig in three parts consisting of just two 36 pound FBT tops and one 90 pound RCF sub. To match that in a passive rig, in addition to the two tops and one sub, I would need three amps, a complicated 3-way crossover and lots of heavy weight speaker wire. No thanks...
For small scale mobile applications, it's active all the way.
Steve,
Bi-amping mains one cable from two amps not a problem. Bi or Tri amping sub/main stack systems one cable not a problem that is why they make speakon connectors!
