$100 for a 1.5 hour karaoke gig for a Church Group on a Tuesday night?

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!
Honestly I don't care about what anyone else does a good portion of people in my market run with 100% illegal libraries but if you are willing to do Karaoke streaming off YouTube how can you preach to others about legal libraries?

As high and mighty as you may think that sounds it's pure folly. At the every least you are foolishly denying reality.

- YouTube and illegal libraries have nothing in common.
- Private Karaoke parties are typically 60 people or less, students, family, or co-workers
- YouTube has about 12,000,000 million karaoke tracks accessible by anyone
- YouTube is the single largest music streaming service in the world - much bigger than Apple, Spotify, etc.

As a KJ host you would certainly benefit from a dedicated karaoke software and from the gig report given you can see that a lack of independent search features, catalogs, and legacy product made the job difficult and disappointing with VDJ as the source. Despite that, it would be foolish to overlook the largest and most obvious resources.

Any group of individuals (like students or co-workers) with access to a sound system and internet can create a working karaoke night. People can easily search YouTube instantly on any device - and even do it in advance of the party. There are over a dozen karaoke versions of "Greased Lightning" on YouTube. It takes no more than an iPad and a mic line mixer to add karaoke to an existing sound system. I'm not suggesting you use VDJ or a browser as your karaoke system. I simply acknowledging that in this day and age your "available library" should not be limited to your own hard drive or CDs.

If you're not tapping into the resources around you and can't access things so readily on hand to your clients, then you're going to appear out of touch when providing karaoke or any music service.

I can easily see an iPad in my setup with the ability to run a request from YouTube. Why would I tell customers I don't have a given song when they can plainly find it on their own phone instantly?
 
Last edited:
Legality and recording quality aside, yep - if the client says 'can you play hit the quan' and you say no, never heard of it, don't have it they're very likely to come up and hand you their phone with it cue'd up.

I've not done the karaoke thing (from this side) so I'm finding this very interesting to read.

I'm not looking for music on youtube - but my kids are, my customers are (groom from last weeks wedding found ALL the music they wanted on youtube!)

I got Spotify on my android phone for this reason - works very very well BTW. And I've seen other DJs at weddings use their phones and youtube. At least i'm paying.
 
As high and mighty as you may think that sounds it's pure folly. At the every least you are foolishly denying reality.

- YouTube and illegal libraries have nothing in common.
- Private Karaoke parties are typically 60 people or less, students, family, or co-workers
- YouTube has about 12,000,000 million karaoke tracks accessible by anyone
- YouTube is the single largest music streaming service in the world - much bigger than Apple, Spotify, etc.

As a KJ host you would certainly benefit from a dedicated karaoke software and from the gig report given you can see that a lack of independent search features, catalogs, and legacy product made the job difficult and disappointing with VDJ as the source. Despite that, it would be foolish to overlook the largest and most obvious resources.

Any group of individuals (like students or co-workers) with access to a sound system and internet can create a working karaoke night. People can easily search YouTube instantly on any device - and even do it in advance of the party. There are over a dozen karaoke versions of "Greased Lightning" on YouTube. It takes no more than an iPad and a mic line mixer to add karaoke to an existing sound system. I'm not suggesting you use VDJ or a browser as your karaoke system. I simply acknowledging that in this day and age your "available library" should not be limited to your own hard drive or CDs.

If you're not tapping into the resources around you and can't access things so readily on hand to your clients, then you're going to appear out of touch when providing karaoke or any music service.

I can easily see an iPad in my setup with the ability to run a request from YouTube. Why would I tell customers I don't have a given song when they can plainly find it on their own phone instantly?

There's really nothing high and mighty about it Bob I truly couldn't care less what anyone else does and I will tell you that I have used YouTube before to grab a song in an emergency. I've used Napster and I've used Torrents in the past also. I'll also tell you I have a music subscription and I've been buying music since I was about 7 years old

I also don't preach to others on their operation or where they get their music....I don't care

Using your logic Bob there's no difference in buying a HD full of music for a couple of hundred bucks or using YouTube. Why do we bother to pay for music?

If you care to look back my posts have been consistent over the years I've been an advocate of library licensing for quite some time. You would be able to access your music anywhere and anyhow you want and pay a monthly or yearly fee for having it. It would likely work out to less than the average DJ spends now and if anyone had the interest to enforce it (that would be the hitch in it) would weed out those that are stealing music
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bobcat
There's really nothing high and mighty about it Bob

Don't mind Bob as he seems completely incapable of bypassing the opportunity to fling an insult and demonstrate his complete lack of social decorum these days.
 
That is great that you're helping them out ad at a fair price. It's hard for some to find some good clean fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ittigger
Another thread that hasn't aged well.

Most DJ software to date includes major streaming sources for live use and instant compatibility directly and conspicuously within the interface.

The notion of "legitimacy" as charcaterized by a simuraneously feigned but pricipled intransigence has been laid bare