Commercial use or public performance

To many ads? Support ODJT and see no ads!

Scott Hanna

Mac Daddy DJ
ODJT Supporter
Oct 25, 2006
9,071
14,603
60
Cleveland, OH
www.djincleveland.com
I seen posts on boards saying that technically playing cd's or mp3's by dj's is violating something because cds and mp3 have statements that say something about not being for commercial use or public performance

some things from BMI, the group that collects fees from venues
When you purchase a record, tape or CD, the purchase price covers your private listening right only. Once you decide to play these in public - such as in a restaurant, bar, café or telephone music-on-hold service - it becomes an additional performance of the music, which is known as a "public performance." The copyright owners of musical works have the exclusive right of public performance. Therefore, any public performances by others require permission. That's where BMI comes in. To learn more about the rights of songwriters, click here.

With a BMI Music Performance Agreement, you'll be entitled to use any BMI-affiliated music.

Although most people buy tapes, CDs, or digital audio files thinking they are now their property, there is a distinction in the law between owning a copy of the music and owning the songs on the CD, etc. There is also a difference between a private performance of copyrighted music and a public performance. When you buy a tape, CD, or digital audio file, the purchase price covers only your private listening use, similar to the “home” use of “home” videos. Once you decide to play these tapes, CDs, or your iPod in your business, it becomes a public performance.

Q: If Musicians Are Playing Live Music Aren’t They Responsible For Public Performance Fees?

Since it’s your business or organization that’s benefiting by the performance of music, you are responsible for ensuring your organization is properly licensed. This responsibility cannot be passed on to anyone else even if musicians hired are independent contractors.
 
I seen posts on boards saying that technically playing cd's or mp3's by dj's is violating something because cds and mp3 have statements that say something about not being for commercial use or public performance

some things from BMI, the group that collects fees from venues

A wedding/etc. is a private event.
 
In Indiana, it's the venue's responsibility to pay any performance fees for music usage. Gotta love that.
 
As I understand it, "mechanical" rights apply to the medium, ie the CD, tape or other storage medium. Here Stateside, the buyer owns the mechanical but not the playback rights.

Laws vary in different countries. In Japan, for example, CDs can be rented like we rent DVDs. Also, as I understand, Canadian DJs don't "own" their promomotional CDs. Said discs can be recalled by the supplier.

As Rocky mentioned, mobile DJs aren't concerned with royalty payments because we're doing private engagements. If the DJ sponsors an event open to the public, that's different. :)
 
As Rocky mentioned, mobile DJs aren't concerned with royalty payments because we're doing private engagements. If the DJ sponsors an event open to the public, that's different. :)

In Canada the venue is supposed to be responsible for SOCAN payments but most don't bother or are bothered at least in my area
 
well in Australia any venue that holds a wedding isnt private anyone can still walk in off the street so they classify that as a public venue...

if its in a backyard then that is a PRIVATE Venue

anyway thats what it is here...
 
In the US, it's not the private/public nature of the venue ITSELF that determines "privet or public" event, but the nature of the event itself.

A party renting just on one SIDE of a room in a restaurant that is still open for business to the public (even if the other side OF the room ITSELF is open to public dining during the event) is hosting a "private event."

This because the "event" attendees themselves constitute the "normal circle of family and friends" that defines "private" performance for copyright compliance purposes.

That there happen to be "public people" in the periphery doesn't matter.

If the bar had you there performing for all their customers in the establishment where anyone could walk in, then THAT'S a "public" performance.

It is the event type, and who did the hiring for what purpose that will determine public vs. private. Not the nature of the venue itself, or whether or not there happen to be "public people" in the surrounding area.
 
Yeah see its Different where I live

they determine that a venue is Public no matter what is being held at said venue

unless your in your own backyard

even a hall , a club, a sports club is all deemed here as public or they will pay double rates to have it limited (which some do) to members only and unless your a paying member its a public venue to all

thats where the copyright here in Oz is so screwed up