Well, I for one would notice!
I guess you can handle your 16 beers!
Well, I for one would notice!
I guess you can handle your 16 beers!
I hear you. I just don't drink very often at all. Too many painful memories of family members.
When I do it's to celebrate something really big (upcoming Steelers SB victory???), and I pay for it.
I have that damn diabetic problem!
Splayed "angled" away from each other. This does two things, it increases the coverage area and again reduces combing! How much "splay" depends on the projection of the horns! If these speakers had a very tight horn say 30 X 60 it might not be a problem with the inversion of the top cabinets if the bottoms were "tipped down" say another 15 or 20 degrees.
One other thing I don't like (and I may be wrong about it you just can't tell from the pic) is that it appears they are using chain for mounting their speakers! I like solid mounting systems when flying cabinets.
Actually an outward splay angle will increase comb filtering - by increasing the distance between the centers of the speaker elements. Splaying is another thing that has been known to be wrong for at least 25 years.
Vertical arraying of sources is preferred (i.e. line array). Turn the tops on their side and vertically stack them with the HF elements in a line, and the woofers in a line.
Alternatively, place the boxes at right angles so that the elements will crossfire. This will help to minimize the distance between the elements, and will reduce (but not eliminate) the comb filtering that will happen.
I prefer braided cable for any overhead applications myself. But, in this case, chain is acceptable. Given the size of the photo it is difficult to know for sure, but the rigging for the flown speakers appears to be reasonable.
my question is,,, if it is a Karaoke set up... really, do they even need that much? The tent didn't look that big...