But you can stack like 4 of them on top of each other and make an 800w column ... super-d-duperdy.LOL... At only 200W peak, not quite ready to compete with the Bose L1, but close.[emoji1]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But you can stack like 4 of them on top of each other and make an 800w column ... super-d-duperdy.LOL... At only 200W peak, not quite ready to compete with the Bose L1, but close.[emoji1]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
About 65 watts RMS driving 3 woofers with minimal motor (magnet) structure, thus the max SPL of 94db, probably with lots of distortion.
But they say, "The system has thermal and dynamic overload protection, so the sound is always clean and clear no matter how hard it’s pushed."
I think @steve149 should buy a couple, then tell us how much he likes them.[emoji1]
"Brought to you... by the company... that just had to recall all the Rane 12s!"
I'm not sure it's that bad, but I do know that if the exact same, identical equipment (Rane 12 & 72) had been introduced with the name "Numark" on it, at the same price, it probably would be a flop.So true.. In Music turned Rane into a shit show. I'm so glad I had the opportunity to own Rane gear prior to the buy out.
I'm not sure it's that bad, but I do know that if the exact same, identical equipment (Rane 12 & 72) had been introduced with the name "Numark" on it, at the same price, it probably would be a flop.
Whenever I see "redesigned" ... I think "for cost cutting purposes" ..