Basically the same price as the QSC KW181. I personally find the QSC more musical, but the EV hits a bit harderr.They are up to about $2,242 now shipped for a pair.
Basically the same price as the QSC KW181. I personally find the QSC more musical, but the EV hits a bit harderr.They are up to about $2,242 now shipped for a pair.
NSL is about 30 minutes from me. no shipping..but alas, sales taxThey are up to about $2,242 now shipped for a pair.
When you buy things, ship them to me .. voila .. no sales tax.NSL is about 30 minutes from me. no shipping..but alas, sales tax
Enjoy - that's an AWESOME sub ...
Honestly, the only difference with a passive setup is YOU have to set up the crossover .. either in the amp (some have DSP) or as you have, in an external crossover or driverack/speaker processor.
Personally, I would put a steep or shelving low pass filter around 30Hz or so (you can play with the actual value) and then a 12db sloped curve (try the various options) based around your top size (90 Hz for 15", 100 for 12", 120 for 10:, 150 for 8").
I would also low pass or crossover to the tops using an inverse setup in that 90-150Hz range.
+1 Forgot about that ... even with the top sitting on the bass cab, you'll need at least 7ms of delay. (and I should have known since I had a pair of Yorkville Unity subs with a similar design)Considering this is a folded horn, you will probably have to delay the tops as well. Looks AWESOME though!
Good call on the delay. I shall be implementing that as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Technically TH118s are tapped horns not a traditional folded horn. They won't really extend lower in frequency in groups like folded horns will.
I've seen several postings of people reporting the sound output is about equal to a couple double eighteen bass reflex subs (respected double eighteens), but I haven't formally tested this myself. I got mine a few years ago. They are beasts with very clean deep accurate bass. You can't move them up and down stairs alone (too heavy and bulky). One thing I really wish they had were rubber feet. I'm curious, Agilas583, are the locking skids on yours made of rubber? The skids on mine were sprayed with the same enclosure paint.
Mine have rubber locking skids. I haven't been able to crank these yet but the bass is so amazingly clear on them. I do recognize my previous sound references are peavys and the KW181's but I am so impressed. I will pay for it when I have to move it to gigs. 160 lbs is not light. Luckily it's two of us always at the gigs where the Danley will be used.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What kind of amp are you running with the th118? If you have any question Dj Gaffle on here can answer them for you. I think he has 4 th118's. Just remember that your sound is only as clean as the worse product in your worst in your signal path. The only reason that I say that is because I tried a behringer(sp) crossover and eq years ago and they sounded horrible. Started using BSS mindrive and omnidrives, and BSS eq and difference was amazing. Driveracks are also pretty good. Also in the bass department the amp that is being used is very very important. You can cheap out on amp for tops and not really notice much. Cheap out with an amp that's not up to par for sub duty, and your subs won't have the stump, impact, and definition they should.
Have fun
You know if you really want to ring the Danley out that you need 10x the power of the XLS2002 ... You're really up to an iTech level to make them growl.I am using a crown XLS 2002 for the sub and a Behringer Ultradrive dcx 2496 as a processor. Still very new to the sound game so I am slowly realizing how equipment affect other items. The sound files and soundcard output from my laptop is good, now it's the in between stuff that I have to wait and upgrade.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know if you really want to ring the Danley out that you need 10x the power of the XLS2002 ... You're really up to an iTech level to make them growl.
The 2100w of the XLS is "peak", the 1700w of the Danley is continuous. Maybe my 10x was a bit of an exaggeration, but as Phase mentioned, it's not uncommon to have 2-3x the continuous rating on the amp. The Danley has a 3400w program rating and probably a higher peak rating.I do apologize if this is a stupid question, but if a subwoofer is rated for 1700W at 4 ohms, and an amplifier is rated for 2100W bridged at 4 ohms, wouldn't that amp be enough to power the subwoofer to its capabilities without damaging the speaker, and give the amp some headroom?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk