But at some point, insurance companies will either require your vehicle to have some autonomous capability or they will charge more for those that don't, since those vehicles will be statistically safer than a human driver. As for DJs .. I agree acceptance will be a factor and there will be those that are prejudiced towards a live human ..
Depends on the progression .. they are already statistically better drivers than many .. once they master the driving capabilities of a NASCAR driver, all bets are off.I think it'll be at least a decade before we see vehicles starting to be accepted as being able to self drive.
BTW, I'll be one of the ones paying more to drive.
Comes down to price too ..Comes down to choice.
No one will ever be "required" to hire an autonomous computer DJ over a human
But at some point, insurance companies will either require your vehicle to have some autonomous capability or they will charge more for those that don't, since those vehicles will be statistically safer than a human driver.
As for DJs .. I agree acceptance will be a factor and there will be those that are prejudiced towards a live human ..
Driving with the SKILLS of a NASCAR driver ... and at some point, you might not have the option to self-drive (or you might break the law) .. sort of like seat belts, helmets for motorcyclists, air bags .. yada yada.Do you mean driving like they are a nascar driver or driving on a closed track? Either way, I don't care, I'm still driving.
Like most of the other safety features, they'll start by requiring new cars to have it .. after a certain amount of time, insurance might have special uplift charges if you don't.Unless they plan on retrofitting my vehicles, they'll probably have more luck building that wall first.
Steve’s spot on... just like rear cameras being standard on the majority of cars (I think it’s actually required now), autonomous capabilities will soon be standard. And while insurance companies won’t add a surcharge for not having autonomous capabilities... cars with autonomous capabilities will have lower insurance costs/bigger discounts, incentivizing buyers to choose those cars. Laws in the other hand will have a harder time keeping up with the technologyLike most of the other safety features, they'll start by requiring new cars to have it .. after a certain amount of time, insurance might have special uplift charges if you don't.
We'll see ....
Laws in the other hand will have a harder time keeping up with the technology
Steve’s spot on... just like rear cameras being standard on the majority of cars (I think it’s actually required now), autonomous capabilities will soon be standard. And while insurance companies won’t add a surcharge for not having autonomous capabilities... cars with autonomous capabilities will have lower insurance costs/bigger discounts, incentivizing buyers to choose those cars. Laws in the other hand will have a harder time keeping up with the technology
I agree with not buying a preloaded HD. It's illegal and you don't know what you'll be getting. With all the downloading sites available I don't see a lot of people buying CDs. Especially when there may be just one or 2 good songs on it.The vast majority of pools only cover recent material .. that's their primary purpose .. to get out new material. There are a few that have some back catalog, but no one in their right mind would rely solely on that. That's where buying CD collections come in .. NOT buying pre-loaded hard drives.
People are seeing how easy it is to just create a playlist and use a BT speaker to enhance a party and thus think they can forego a DJ at their next event.
You can get bulk CDs at tag/garage sales, eBay and $5 CDs at Walmart.I agree with not buying a preloaded HD. It's illegal and you don't know what you'll be getting. With all the downloading sites available I don't see a lot of people buying CDs. Especially when there may be just one or 2 good songs on it.
Downloading music is what put the small record stores out of business. I still wish they had a subscription service that also had older stuff as well just in case you needed something. Too bad the focus is on all this new crap coming out. I say that because a lot of it to me is crap. People who have a look and no real talent.
There may not be autonomous vehicles without drivers racking up miles, but they have been on the road for a while (at least 9 years), lots of them, racking up over 10 million miles driven (Waymo/Google has 5 mil, Uber has 2 mil, ...).Before everyone puts the cart before the horse no system other than test vehicles have been approved for use in populated public areas other than mainly test cases with a driver. So, Saying that fully autonomous cars are much safer then a regular drivers is still speculative as there are way less than 1% of the vehicles on the road now. Tesla’s system requires a drivers interaction and is not fully autonomous. And right now their system has been out the longest and closest to be mass marketed. Presently they are not sure when Full automation will happen and if the system currently in the car will be upgraded as that baseline hasn’t been establish yet. Interestedly they have been selling the system for a couple of years now and has changed their wording to say “Enhanced Autopilot includes additional driver assistance features. Every driver is responsible for remaining alert and active when using Autopilot, and must be prepared to take action at any time”. So there is a good chance they will have to upgrade the processors & senors to be fully autonomous. Most likely to run a fully autonomously the system will also require backup & fail safe system which I am willing to bet isn’t there yet. Given the cost of the system so far that would add many thousand on to the price of a car. We know now for a non-fully Automated car we’re talking about adding 5k to 7K to the price of a car. So your $20K Kia would be 20/30% more. It’s anyone guess what the final price will be considering what you’ll need to include and all the required testing to meet Government requirements which aren’t fully determined yet. If you think it be done cheaply on a involving such a critical system, I wouldn’t hold my breath. But Elon’s going to Mars in 7 years I am sure you can buy a seat on the ship that will be fully automated. Of course there is no way back, no air, water, food, there. We can presently only landing 2 tons now and reasonable launch windows only happen every 2.5 years. The real kicker is we don’t know if we can stay healthy in that low of gravity permanently. NASA has a more logical plan (go & return) using some existing hardware, putting a Deep Space station in cis-lunar orbit, checking out & developing hardware, possible Moonlandings and then a test flight to Phobos after sending a station with renewables in orbit around Mars somewhere around 2040. Of course they haven’t figured out how to get a large manned lander down to Mars yet. Right now the plan doesn’t involve other nations but that may change in the future as the only logical & affordable way would be a multI-national team as on the ISS.
There may not be autonomous vehicles without drivers racking up miles, but they have been on the road for a while (at least 9 years), lots of them, racking up over 10 million miles driven (Waymo/Google has 5 mil, Uber has 2 mil, ...).
Accident rates are low, many due to a human overriding the computer. All I'm saying is it will be short-order that the AI systems have tested enough situations to be "better" statistically, than a human driver, and when that happens, you know insurance companies will be pushing to include and mandate the tech.
I have an autonomous driving vacuum cleaner...does get lost once in a while, but never drinks or texts while driving...