Shure has this nice feature set comparison between the two:Shure comparison
For what it's worth, I have 3 systems that all use 4 Audio Techinica Pro 10s in 1 rack space - 2 lavs, 2 handhelds. I never have to scan for an open frequency and I never get drop outs. I use them mostly for ceremonies.
For MY main mic and for toasts, I use a Seinheiser G4 because it's great at surpressing feedback and built like a tank. The AT Pro 10s are not the Crème de la Crème of mics but they get the job done. Again, 4 mics in 1 rack space..never drop out.
location will play a major role in this. I was in jersey city Thursday by the water and that location is a nightmare for most wireless systems.For what it's worth, I have 3 systems that all use 4 Audio Techinica Pro 10s in 1 rack space - 2 lavs, 2 handhelds. I never have to scan for an open frequency and I never get drop outs. I use them mostly for ceremonies.
For MY main mic and for toasts, I use a Seinheiser G4 because it's great at surpressing feedback and built like a tank. The AT Pro 10s are not the Crème de la Crème of mics but they get the job done. Again, 4 mics in 1 rack space..never drop out.
What did you use and did you get it to work?location will play a major role in this. I was in jersey city Thursday by the water and that location is a nightmare for most wireless systems.
Qlxd and yes it worked but I’ve been there way back with blx mics and it didn’t work at all I had to go to a wired micWhat did you use and did you get it to work?
location will play a major role in this. I was in jersey city Thursday by the water and that location is a nightmare for most wireless systems.
For what it's worth, I have 3 systems that all use 4 Audio Techinica Pro 10s in 1 rack space - 2 lavs, 2 handhelds. I never have to scan for an open frequency and I never get drop outs. I use them mostly for ceremonies.
The AT Pro 10s are not the Crème de la Crème of mics but they get the job done. Again, 4 mics in 1 rack space..never drop out.
I wonder if this is a situation where Infrared Technology would be more beneficial to use. I remember a number of manufactures utilizing infrared about 10+ years ago. It never really caught on though.
The system 10 Pro has just about 4 ms latency. This is pretty standard for digital mics. I believe my Line 6 mics were 5 ms. Analog mics have no appreciable latency. I say "appreciable" because these days, many do some digital processing internally on the audio signal. To put it in perspective, 1 ms latency is about the time it takes your voice to travel 1 foot.To some extent your AT Pro 10 does some of the same frequency hopping though the transmission needs to be (seemingly) continuous. This eliminates the need for RF frequency planning - but at the cost of higher latency than the UHF counterparts that stay locked on one frequency. This similarity in frequency hopping is why the receivers are detachable - so (like a WiFi router) you can move the receiver closer for better performance in tough areas.
Cranky much? I was stating that you stated the price was $X.XX but the link YOU provided was showing different. You are right thought, it is hard to conceive the level of trustworthy resources in this thread.So, look and shop elsewhere.
Wow... hard to conceive the level of lazy expectation in this thread.
Ya know, the phrase: "you get what you pay for" is completely wrong. The reality is: "you get what you're willing to work for."
Let me recommend KPODJ if you don't find something somewhere else.Update: My trusty old GTD finally died last week. I was going to order a Shure system but there are none to be found anywhere. I'm headed down to Guitar Center tomorrow where they'll hopefully still have a Sennheiser XSW2 in stock.